The United Nations World Summit on the Information Society was held November 16-18 in Tunisia. The objective was to discuss how to bring the Internet to developing nations, but that was overshadowed by a controversy over Internet governance.
Before the conference began,
Information Week characterized this issue like this:
In the struggle over who owns the Internet, the United States currently holds all the supervision cards through the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Washington doesn’t plan on relinquishing its authority, despite objections from the United Nations, the European Union and such countries as Brazil, China, Cuba and Iran, who have all said recently that they would like a bigger say.
Many editorial pages, like the
New York Times, called for the US to retain control, explaining the importance of a single Internet, not "a balkanized Internet, where countries or regions set up their own Webs, leading to duplicate sites, confusion and a breakdown in the effectiveness of the global network." (
Other Times story.)
Members of an academic group called the
Internet Governance Project suggested a denationalization of ICANN, arguing that US oversight contributes nothing to the security and stability of the Domain Name System. Rather, it is the distributed nature of DNS that produces the real security. The policy paper, "
Political Oversight of ICANN," can be downloaded from the group's website.
A last minute compromise allows ICANN to continue its work. But the Summit did acknowledge the need for more cooperation, and created the Internet Governance Forum to provide a platform for discussion. The issue is not settled, however; only delayed.
[
Press release and more information]